SECTION II
ORTHOPEDIC SURGERY
CHAPTER VI
AMPUTATION
SERVICE, A.E.F.
ORGANIZATION AND DEVELOPMENT
It
was recognized at an early date by the chief surgeon, A. E. F., that
the proper
management of amputation cases constituted a problem for which special
provision ought to be
made. This was in conformity with the advice of the senior consultant
in orthopedic surgery, A.
E. F., who had had special opportunities for acquiring knowledge of the
various orthopedic
problems encountered in France and Great Britain, prior to our entrance
into the war. The first
step toward meeting this problem was taken in August, 1918, when, in an
order which defined
the responsibilities of the general and special professional services,
the supervision of amputation
cases was assigned to the division of orthopedic surgery.1 Foreseeing the need of a special
amputation service, the senior consultant, orthopedic surgery,
immediately set machinery in
motion, looking toward the training of a medical officer for this
special type of work. Facilities
for study were available in the bureau of artificial limbs of the
American Red Cross in Paris and
through the cooperation of the Allied Governments these facilities were
extended to the chief
amputation centers in England, Belgium, France, and Italy. Ample
opportunity thus was provided
for the acquisition of familiarity with all aspects of the amputation
problem.
It
soon proved that the chief difficulty in the way of providing proper
treatment for this
important group of cases was the general lack of understanding among
military surgeons of the
functional requirements in amputation cases. An amputation stump is
useful only in the light of
the prosthetic appliance which can be worn and of the degree of
functional restoration obtained
by its aid. Therefore, it is evident that the entire treatment, from
the amputation itself, up to and
including the fitting of the artificial limb, must be planned with a
clear vision of the end result
which may be obtained, and with knowledge of each and every danger
which must be avoided in
order to achieve this ideal. Familiarity with the functional value of
amputations at different
levels, with the physical requirements of a good stump, and with the
different types of prosthetic
appliances, is essential to the attainment of this goal.
The
opportunities for acquiring this knowledge prior to the war were few
and what there
were had generally been neglected. Both in England and in France, the
need for improvement in
the treatment of amputation cases was forcibly brought home, early in
1915, when end results in
the early war amputation cases began to be viewed. Many of these cases
were in lamentable
condition. The vast majority presented fat, congested stumps, with
powerless muscles and serious
joint contractures. Many had lost important segments of their limbs,
due to the mistaken notion
that a longer stump would be an incumbrance; and many others had to
undergo reamputation and
to lose
688
valuable segments which might otherwise have been saved had suitable
treatment been applied.
A large number had to go back to the hospitals for long periods of
treatment before artificial
limbs could be fitted. All made very slow progress and some never
succeeded in learning to
walk.
It
was in order to avoid similar results in the American Expeditionary
Forces that the
senior consultant, orthopedic surgery, planned to organize a special
amputation service through
which all amputation cases would pass before being evacuated to the
United States.2
It
was not until April, 1918, that American battle casualties occurred in
sufficient
numbers to justify the organization of an amputation service. At this
time a small beginning was
made at Base Hospital No. 9, Chateauroux, France. 3 All
amputation cases were segregated in
special wards, a gymnasium was established and a prosthesis shop
organized. By July the service
had expanded to 120 beds.
It
had been the intention to have all amputation cases pass through this
center. This plan
proved impractical, however, when casualties began to occur in large
numbers. Following the
American battle activities along the Marne there was a sudden great
influx of wounded into the
base hospitals, American Expeditionary Forces, and some of the
amputation cases were
evacuated to the United States without receiving special care. To
prevent a similar happening in
the future the amputation service was transferred, in July, 1918, to
Base Hospital No. 8, at
Savenay.2
This
location was selected because of its designation as the main
distributing point for the
evacuation of the wounded to the United States. From August,1918, until
the signing of the
armistice, no cases were evacuated without going through the hospital
center at Savenay. All
cases of amputation, therefore, could be seen and special treatment
instituted when necessary.
Early in 1919, the hospital centers at Bordeaux and at Brest also were
designated as points of
evacuation,4 and in order to meet this situation it was
necessary to organizes special amputation
services at these points. Medical officers who had received training at
Savenay were available for
duty elsewhere and little difficulty was experienced in supplying an
experienced personnel.
Prothesis shops also were organized and equipped at these points.
FUNCTIONS
The
basic idea underlying the organization of an amputation service was to
provide a
center where the special problems encountered in the treatment of war
amputations would be
understood and where all facilities would be available to solve these
problems with a view to the
ultimate recovery of the maximum degree of function. Since it was the
general policy that
reconstructive surgery in totally disabled cases would be deferred
until arrival in the United
States, the functions of the amputation service consisted essentially
of the following: First, to
provide proper surgical, physiotherapeutic. and prosthetic treatment
for amputation cases.
Second, to gather information as to proper methods of treatment, and to
spread this knowledge
among the surgeons of the American Expeditionary Forces. Third, to
prepare cases for
evacuation to the United States, and to insure their arrival there in
the best possible condition.
689
The
first function had to do with the actual treatment of the patient,
provision for which
was made by the organization of three departments--surgical.
phvsio-therapeutic, and prosthetic. The surgical department naturally
was the most important: its work was essentially the same as
that of any other surgical organization, including operating, ward
dressing, and records. Physiotherapy was under the direction of an
athletic instructor of great ingenuity who conducted daily
classes for the ambulatory cases. The men were put through stump
drills, which were
exceedingly valuable both for strengthening weak muscles and for
teaching balance. This
instructor also conducted classes for the men who had been fitted with
provisional legs, and
much of the success attained here was the result of the training in
walking which he gave these
patients. In addition, a certain number of reconstruction aides
attached to the service
administered massage and exercise to the bed cases. The prosthesis shop
was under the direction
of a sergeant, first-class, Medical Department, who was an artificial
limb maker by trade. He
quickly learned to make the plaster of Paris sockets for the
provisional legs, and as the demand
for appliances increased, trained others of the hospital detachment in
the work so that there was
never any delay in supplying apparatus. The skeleton legs. complete in
every detail except for the
socket were supplied by the American Red Cross.
The
second function, that of disseminating knowledge of proper methods of
treatment
and of the common mistakes that were being made, was taken care of in
two ways: By written
reports to the senior orthopedic consultant; by personal visits to most
of the hospital centers in
France where opportunity to talk with the officers actually engaged in
treating the cases proved
most helpful. All amputation cases received at the hospital center,
Savenay, were inspected upon
arrival and careful note made of their condition.2 When
there was evidence of improper
treatment, this was checked against the hospitals from which such cases
had come, and thus it
was possible at the end of every month to send full reports to the
senior consultant who could
make such use of the information as he deemed proper.
The
third function of the amputation service was to prepare cases for
evacuation to the
United States and to insure arrival there in good condition. This was
chiefly a matter of
judgment and policy in selecting cases for evacuation, since by virtue
of authority vested in the
local orthopedic consultant nonorthopedic patient could be evacuated
without his approval. Such a super-abundance of transportable patients
was always
available that it was necessary merely to make a systematic effort to
keep them listed in order to be able to hold the
nonevacuable cases for treatment.
TECHNIQUE
OF AMPUTATIONS
In
order to understand the special problems encountered in the treatment
of amputation
cases in the American Expeditionary Forces and the work of the
amputation service, it is
necessary to review the surgery of military amputations from the time
when the limb was
removed to the period of convalescence when it was possible to evacuate
the patient to the
United States.
690
IN THE ZONE OF THE ADVANCE
In
considering the technique of amputations when performed in the zone of
the advance,
it is important, first of all, to stress the subordinate role which
military surgery necessarily
occupied in relation to military tactics. Primarily military surgery
had to be adapted to the
varying conditions of military activity. With stable trench warfare the
casualties were not
numerous, and aside from raids and local actions the facilities of the
evacuation hospitals were
not strained. During such periods it was possible to give each case
individual attention and
careful after treatment, and special cases could be kept for
considerable periods without
evacuation. In periods of battle activity conditions were quite the
reverse. The influx of casualties
was enormous, the demand for beds quite in excess of the possibility of
supply, and all hospital
facilities were strained to the utmost. Each case had to be treated
with a view to immediate
evacuation, and the surgical procedures had to be adapted to meet this
need. Further, because of
the difficulty of evacuating the wounded from the field of battle under
intense fire, the time
between receipt of injury and of reaching evacuation hospitals in given
instances was usually
much greater than in quiet times. Contaminated wounds often became
infected wounds before
they reached the hands of the surgeon, therefore different operative
procedures had to be
employed. In such cases the prime endeavor was to obtain adequate
drainage.
In
respect to amputations, this fundamental rule of military surgery was
strikingly
illustrated. During the periods of quiet in the interval between
February 5, 1918, and June 1,
1918, along sectors of the front occupied by American troops, the
surgeons of the evacuation
hospitals worked under almost ideal conditions. Postoperative cases
could be followed for as
long a period as was necessary before evacuation. Débridement, with
closure by primary.
delayed primary, or secondary suture, applied even to amputations. The
amputation usually was
performed at the level of the wound or immediately above it, with
careful excision of all soiled,
damaged, or devitalized tissue. Flaps were formed, not according to the
classic modes of
amputation, but in the way they could best be obtained from the sound
tissues of the limb, with
the view to conserving the greatest length of stump. If the time since
injury was short and the
amount of soft-part damage was well localized, it was occasionally
possible to close the wound
by primary suture. The more common procedure was to fix the flaps in
eversion, leave the wound
open, and await developments for 24 to 48 hours. At the end of this
time the wound was care-fully dressed and bacterial examination made.
If the condition of the wound appeared favorable,
the flaps were then drawn together and sutured (delayed primary
suture). If, instead, there was
suggestion of infection, the wound was left open and Carrel-Dakin
treatment instituted. At
certain percentage of stumps treated by the latter method were closed
at the end of 12 to 21 days
by secondary suture; the remainder were evacuated and went on to
cicatrization, later requiring
some type of reconstruction operation.
In
periods of battle activity the operative procedure was quite different:
amputation cases
had to be evacuated almost immediately. It had been shown that this
immediate secondary
evacuation could be done with little risk to the
691
patient if the wound was left open. The great danger was infection,
especially of the anaerobic
type. Cases could not be watched carefully when being transported on a
train, and in the case of
at partially sutured stump or of one with flaps even though these were
not closed, infection might
develop and assume fatal proportions before the patient reached a
hospital where proper
treatment could be instituted.
It
was to meet such a situation that the flapless amputation,
unfortunately misnamed the
guillotine amputation, had been devised by the surgeons of the Allied
Armies early in the war.
The skin was divided by a circular incision at the lowest possible
level, taking into consideration
the condition for which the amputation was performed. The skin was
allowed to retract and then
the fascia and outer layer of muscles were sectioned at this level and
in turn allowed to retract.
The inner layer of muscles was then cut and the bone was in turn
divided at a still slightly higher
level. When the amputation was completed the cut surface was in the
shape of a slightly inverted
cone or if the retraction had been great, a flat surface.
The
reproach which has been directed against this operation is not so much
against the
flapless amputation itself as against the surgeons who misunderstood it
and performed it as a
guillotine division of the limb. By the latter method no allowance was
made for retraction and
upon the completion of the operation the wound appeared as a conical
surface with the bone
protruding at the apex and the skin margin representing the base. By
this method there was an
unnecessary sacrifice of soft parts. Undoubtedly better results might
have been obtained if more
heed had been given to the conclusions reached by the Interallied
Surgical Congress at its
meeting in 1917 which, inso far as concerns amputations, are as follows: 5
Primary amputations or those delayed 24 to 48
hours will be made as nearly as possible at the site of
fracture by simple section of the soft parts or with slight trimming of
the bone; in less grave cases the amputation will
be made as near as possible to the level of the fracture.
Amputation
for infection will be done by simple cross section or with very short
flaps fixed in eversion. The
stump will be regularized, if this is necessary, when the wound is
disinfected and when all possible extension of the
soft parts has been obtained.
A
study of the end results justifies the conclusion that the flapless
type of amputation had
a definite place in military surgery. It possessed the advantages of
preserving the maximum
length of stump, of providing wide drainage and of requiring a minimum
of time for its
performance. It had the disadvantages of requiring a protracted period
of after-treatment and of
necessitating in most instances secondary reconstruction operations to
prepare the stump for
prosthesis. Cases operated by this method at the front usually were
kept under observation for
48 hours, at the end of which time they could be evacuated in safety.
If necessary they could be
evacuated immediately with only slight risk. Their after-treatment was
exclusively a matter for
the base hospitals to which they had been evacuated.
IN THE BASE HOSPITALS
Nearly
as many amputations were performed in the base hospitals at the rear as
in the
evacuation hospitals at the front. The great majority of these
amputations were performed for
sepsis and were of the open or flapless type.
692
The
procedure here was similar to that of the front, but with the
difference that the patient
who was usually very ill did not have to be evacuated. The
after-treatment was under the control
of the surgeon who performed the operation.
In
the case of infection involving the upper end of the tibia or the knee
joint,
disarticulation of the knee by the flapless method proved a useful
procedure. The operative risk
was much less than with amputation of the thigh and it also possessed
the advantages of opening
up a smaller amount of fresh tissue to infection and of not giving rise
to troublesome retraction of
the soft parts. Later, when disinfection was obtained, reamputation for
the purpose of
regularizing the stump could be performed under ideal conditions.
FIG.
129.- Use of
Thomas splint in
application of fixed extension to an amputation stump to overcome soft
part
retraction
A
good many amputations were necessitated by secondary hemorrhage. Such
hemorrhage was always caused by burrowing sepsis, and it was in order
to control the latter
rather than to stop the hemorrhage that amputation was indicated in
most instances. In a certain
number of cases amputations were performed, not for sepsis alone, but
because of the presence of
hopelessly mutilating injuries or of chronic sepsis in which it was
apparent that a better
functional result would be obtained with an artificial limb than with
the injured member even if
the treatment of the latter should prove unexpectedly successful. In
practically all amputations of
this latter group the part involved was the foot, ankle, or lower leg.
It was well recognized that
the possibility of saving any part of a hand justified a long uphill
fight, whereas, with the leg, the
functional result with-mar-artificial limb was in many cases better
than if a badly damaged foot
or ankle had been preserved.
693
TREATMENT IMMEDIATELY FOLLOWING
AMPUTATION
The
chief problem of after-treatment was the large number of open
amputation wounds.
Very little difficulty was experienced in the case of amputations
treated by either primary or
delayed closure. Unfortunately, the number of these, from the nature of
the military situation,
was extremely small. This is shown by the following figures obtained
from a group of 550 cases
treated at the Hospital Center, Savenay. 2 Of these, 323,
or 58 percent, were either flapless or guillotine amputations; 170, or
30 percent, were amputations with flaps but without
closure, and only 62, or 11 percent, were amputations with closure. Of
the 550 cases, 493, or 88
percent, were open amputations as against 11 percent closed. It is
also interesting to note that of
the 62 cases with primary or delayed primary suture, only 75 percent
remained closed.
FIG.
130.- Use of a
spreader in
sliding extension applied to an amputation stump to overcome soft part
retraction
SOFT-PART RETRACTION
With
an open stump, the chief danger in respect to future function was that
of retraction
due to the contraction of the severed muscles. Thus, in an amputation
of the thigh by the flapless
method, if the stump was examined a few days after operation it would
be found that the skin had
retracted considerably above the level of the bone and that the surface
of the wound instead of
remaining a plane had become frankly conical. If the process was
allowed to continue, at the end
of two to three weeks the end of the stump would have
694
become a long tapering cone with the bone protruding a distance of 2
to 3 inches. and the
distance between the bone tip and the retracted skin margin 5 to 6
inches. If nature was
permitted to pursue her course, the marginal cicatrix contracted,
shutting off the blood supply to the distal part, and after 8 to 10
weeks there remained only a protruding length of
bare bone which in the course of time was sloughed away.
The
process of retraction and natural reamputation was seen in its most
extreme degree in
the thigh but it could also be observed in amputations of the upper
arm, forearm, or lower leg. It always led to a considerable diminution
in the length of the stump, and in the case
of the thigh this often amounted to as much as 5 or 6 inches. In
addition it rendered the
FIG.
131.- This and
Figures 132 and
133 show amputation of the thigh by the flapless method in various
stages of
healing under the influence of continuous extension. In this figure,
the first stage, all possible extention of the skin
flaps has been obtained with the result that the skin has turned in
over the end of the stump.
stump conical and less suitable for prostesis while at the same time
decreasing its power. Usually a broad, skin flaps has been obtained
with the result that the thin terminal scar resulted
which was Akin has turned in over the end of the stump adherent to the
bone, and a secondary
operation usually Was required before an artificial limb could be worn.
But a stump is, above all
things, a lever and, except in certain special regions which are
mentioned elsewhere, its most
important tissue is length. Therefore the importance of counteracting
this process at its inception
was obvious.
Soft-part
retraction could be prevented or, if already present, could be overcome
in large
part by the proper use of extension. Extension was obtained by the
application to the skin of
adhesive plaster strips which extended from as close to the skin margin
as possible, well up to
FIG.
132.- Second
stage. The scar is
contracting, but a fairly large open area with indolent skin margin
remains
the base of the, stump. The free ends of the strips were attached to
tapes and these were fixed by
buckles to a spreader of suitable size and shape to which the extension
cord was fixed. Traction was obtained either by leading the cord over a
pulley at the end of the
695
bed and fastening it to a weight (sliding extension), or1 by
applying a short Thomas splint and
the cord fastened to its end under tension (fixed extension).Sliding
extension usually was best for
hospital treatment, but the fixed extension with the Thomas splint was
required for
transportation. The adhesive strips did not interfere with the
application of the dressings, and the
strips were unbuckled from the spreader when complete exposure of the
wound was required.
The wound treatment could be carried on as adequately with the
extension as without.
Under
the influence of extension retraction was prevented and healing
proceded rapidly. With the circular, flapless type of amputation, the
end result was a thin round cicatrix at the end
of the stump with or without sinuses, depending upon the degree of bone
infection. In open
amputations with short flaps the result was often a linear scar, and
such stumps were quite
suitable for prosthesis without other intervention.
FIG.
133.- The end
result which may be
expected in the absence of the stump with or without bone infection.
The
scar has shut down, pulling the skin with it, and there now remains a
thin, adherent puckered sear sinuses, depending
upon the degree of bone infection. In open amputations with short flaps
the result was often a linear scar, and such
stumps were quite suitable for prosthesis without other intervention.
The
great majority of the open amputations, even when treated with
extension, required
secondary operations to get rid of the sear and the infected tip of
bone. Most of these operations
were of a single nature however, and did not constitute formal
reamputations.
SEPSIS
Septic
stumps constituted an important part of the amputation problem.
Infection was
usually only the continuation of the process for which the amputation
itself had been performed.
It is safe to say that all open amputations were infected. All types
and degrees of infection were seen and all of the possible septic
complicateions were encountered at different times.
FIG.
134.- Amputation
of the thigh by
the flapless method with oblique section in order to save the maximum
amount fected. All types and degrees of of soft tissues. The stump has
healed under extension, but infection were seen and
all of the there remains a chronic osteomyelitis with multiple sinuses
possible septic complications were encountered
at different times.
Such complications were treated according to the usual surgical
principles and require no special
mention. In respect to the special manifestations of infection as seen
in amputation stumps the
most important feature noted was the little difficulty experienced with
the flapless type of
amputation and the endless trouble encountered when a partial closure
had been attempted or
when flaps bad been formed which tended to fall together.
696
Many of the infections terminated by the formation in the stumps of
residual abscesses which
required drainage: occasionally the infection extended to the
neighboring joint with the
production of a septic arthritis. In
a below-the-knee amputation, with secondary infection of the knee
joint, if the septic
arthritis
FIG. 135.- Short
amputation of the
thigh. There has been considerable retraction of soft parts, but the
stump has been
treated by extension, with considerable gain.
FIG.
136.- Short
amputation of the
thigh, with marked considerable retraction of soft parts, but the stump
has
retraction of the soft parts and protrusion of the end of the bone
covered by granulation tissue.
did not respond rapidly to drainage, the chance of procuring a
useful joint was not great enough
to justify a protracted fight, consequently reamputation above the knee
was resorted to much
earlier than if there had been a normal limb.
The
best method of treating wound infection in an amputation stump was
found to be the
Darrel-Dakin method. Most of the wounds responded well to this
treatment: some were
disinfected entirely and in them secondary suture was sucessfully
performed. A troublesome
feature with the Carrel-Dakin method in amputation wounds was the
tendency for the Carrel
tubes to become displaced. This was obviated by stitching them, at
intervals of about 1 inch, to
a
FIG.
137.- This and
Figure 138 show
plastic closure of an open amputation stump, with marked retraction of
the soft
parts. In this pad with its attached tubes to the figure the retraction
of the skin margins is noticeable, and there are
bad scars.
piece of gauze and applying the pad with its attached tubes to the
wound. Thse batteries of tubes had were made up beforehand, sterilized,
and kept ready for use. For
the thigh about eight tubes
were required, for the arm or lower leg, about four. They could be used
quite readily even when
the stump was being treated with extension: thus effective contact of
the solution with all parts of
the wound was assured.
697
After
the acute infection had cleared up, a focus of chronic osteomyelitis in
the terminal
portion of the severed bone usually remained. Almost invariably
multiple short sinuses existed,
and as long as these remained open no difficulty was experienced. Wound
healing progressed
satisfactorily in such cases until only a central ulcer remained, then
the sinuses would begin to
close, the discharge would back up, and abscesses form. At this stage
it was necessary either to
remove the sequestrum, if this could be found, or to excise the
terminal portion of the bone. It was always better to perform these
operations in separate
FIG. 138.- The
same stump as that
shown Figure 137, after closure. The wound was excised, with a cone of
tissue
and the tip of the bone. The skin flaps were mobilized and draw together
steps, preliminary to the later reconstructive operation, rather
than to
FIG.139.- Double
amputation of both
legs. The flapless method has been used in the right and there is an
extensive
terminal osteomyelitis
698
attempt to combine the two in one sitting. In the combined operation
the wound almost
invariably became infected, causing its breakdown and a repeated
operation.
HEMORRHAGE
Secondary
hemorrhage was an infrequent complication of amputation, this
experience
being in marked contrast to that of the Civil War.7 Hemorrhages
occurring 24 to 48 hours after
amputation were due generally to an improperly placed ligature, or to
one insecurely tied.
Subsequent to this time it was usually the result of sepsis. Hemorrhage
was a rare complication
of the flapless type of amputation, even when the stump was badly
infected, but was encountered
more frequently in the amputation with flaps, loosely sutured, in which
drainage was not so
adequate.
JOINT DEFORMITY
Limitation
of movement in the proximal joint of the stump was another complication
to
be feared in amputation cases. When it occurred limitation of movement
was usually the result of
fixation of the stump for a considerable period in improper position.
The patient with a sensitive
amputation stump always tried to get it into a position of muscular
relaxation and to avoid movement. After a time adaptive shortening of
the muscles occurred, the
capsule contracted, and
limitation of movement resulted. This tendency to contracture was
increased still further by the
presence of infection and periarticular inflammation. Generally joint
deformity was found when
treatment had been neglected, and in the case of a thigh amputation was
furthered by the baneful
practice of propping the stump in flexion on a cushion. It was more apt
to develop in short
stumps where its presence was most harmful. The usual deformities were:
In amputation of the
lower leg, incomplete extension of the knee; in amputation of the
thigh, flexion of the hip; in
amputation of the forearm, flexion of the elbow and limited rotary
movement of the forearm; in
amputation of the upper arm, abduction of the shoulder. The movements
impaired were precisely
those which are most essential in order to obtain the best function
with a prosthetic appliance.
Moreover, such joint deformities. in most instances, were avoidable.
When splinting was
indicated it was necessary only to fix the joint in the optimum
position and to require that the
joint be moved through its normal range of motion a few times each day.
Continuous extension,
in addition to preventing retraction, was also an excellent method of
preventing joint
contractures. With amputations of the lower leg and thigh it maintained
the knee and hip in the
extended positions and in the case of the upper arm it was applied
usually in such a way as to
hold the shoulder abducted, these positions being, in each case, the
best for the recovery of
function.
TERMINAL CONDITIONS
As
outlined above, such were the chief problems of treatment in the period
immediately
following amputation; however, many conditions were encountered which
constituted the
problems of the more remote periods of treatment. These were the
so-called terminal conditions.
699
At
no time was it the policy of the division of orthopedic surgery, A. E.
F., to undertake
reconstructive surgery in France unless thereby the patient could be
restored to duty. In
amputations the main object was to conserve function in every possible
way and to prepare the
patient for evacuation to the United States. However, the matter of so
evacuating the wounded
proved a very uncertain thing, especially for recumbent cases. Delays
were numerous. In the
principal evacuating centers, such as the hospital center at Savenay,
there were always on hand
really for evacuation several times as many patients as could be
accommodated in the convoys.
While awaiting transportation many of the amputation cases went on to
the terminal stage of
convalescence, and incertain instances advantage was taken of this
delay to perform secondary reconstructive operations. These were done
chiefly in an effort either to render the long sea trip a
safer procedure than it otherwise would have been or to shorten the
period of convalescence.
Among
the conditions thus treated were: Protruding bone; localized terminal
osteomyelitis; terminal ulcers; painful neuromata; painful osteophytes;
intractable joint
deformities; stumps unsuitable for prothesis, either by reason of
amputation at an unfavorable
level or because of insufficient covering of soft parts.
PROTRUDING BONE
Amputation
cases were encountered with a variable length of bare bone protruding
from
an otherwise fairly well-healed wound. This condition, as noted above,
was mainly the result of
failure to employ extension and of consequents of part retraction.
Occasionally it was due to the
hurried amputation of an infected compound fracture where the soft
parts had been simply
divided near the seat of fracture without rectification of the bone. It
was always move the
protruding bone by sectioning it at a level below the soft parts
without disturbing the rest of the
wound. The incision was left open, tie cavity rapidly filled in with
granulation tissue, and
complete cicatrization was usually obtained. Thus the patient was made
ambulatory and
provisional prosthesis could be applied.
LOCALIZED TERMINAL OSTEOMYELITIS
As
stated above, terminal localized osteomyelitis was the usual end
FIG.
140.- Short
amputation of the
lower leg, with marked flexion contraction of the knee. Open wound,
with
chronic osteomyelitis
result in infected amputation stumps. When such cases had progressed
to the chronic stage it
was necessary to get rid of the septic focus. In some, sequestrectomy
was sufficient; in others, the
infected part had to be excised. These operations, in the majority of
instances, were of a simple
nature and were done
700
to allow the stump to become aseptic, so that the necessary
reconstructive operations, which
would be required later, might be performed under the most favorable
conditions.
TERMINAL ULCERS
A
common result in the flapless type of amputation was an intolerent
ulcer, situated in the
center of the scar, directly over the end of the bone. This was caused
practically always by
cicatricial interference with the blood supply to the central part of
the wound. In such cases
complete healing could not be obtained. The end of the bone was in
close relation to the base of the ulcer and there was frequently an
associated osteomyelitis. To
close such a stump it was
necessary to excise the scar with the tip of the bone and perform a
plastic skin operation. If the
stump was short and the amputation situated at the so-called critical
level, it was sometimes
advisable to transplant a pedicle skin flap from the opposite limb in a
two-step procedure.
Some
of these operations were performed in the American Expeditionary
Forces, but
usually only because of exceptional circumstances. There was a
considerable hazard in respect to
the results on account of the danger of stirring up a latent infection,
and if all did not go well,
evacuation might be considerably delayed. On the other hand, these
cases were ambulatory and
could be evacuated in safety, without operation. Treatment, therefore,
was usually deferred until
arrival in the United States.
PAINFUL NEUROMATA
Many
stumps were painful, but in only a few were the symptoms due to
neuromata. In the
majority the causes were to be found either in infection and its
sequelae or in circulatory
disturbances. When definite evidence indicated a neuroma as the cause
of the symptoms it was
always sought to relieve the condition by operation. Such procedures
were simple, gave
immediate relief, and did not delay evacuation.
PAINFUL OSTEOPHYTES
Painful
osteophytes constituted a very minor part of the amputation problem in
the
American Expeditionary Forces, although bony spurs were present in many
of the cases,
sometimes in extreme osteophytes. Much remains to be learned concerning
the cause of these
osteophytes. In many of the war cases infection undoubtedly played an
important ro le in their
production, but, they were also encountered in clean cases. Certain of
these were probably
caused by unnecessary fraying and shredding of the periosteum at the
time of amputation. They
might have been avoided in many instances if the a periosteam method of
sectioning the bone,
advocated by Bunge,7 could have been employed more widely.
This procedure, however, was not
advisable in potentially infected cases such as these. When it was used
and infection developed.
separation of a ring-like sequestrum from the end of the bone resulted.
Fortunately,
osteophytes rarely caused trouble if the stumps were satisfactory in
other
respects. Occasionally a very large spur was found which seemed likely
to interfere mechanically
with the application of a prosthetic appliance, and in such a case it
was usu ally excised.
701
INTRACTABLE JOINT DEFORMITIES
Correction
of joint deformity, when present, was considered a very necessary
therapeutic
measure before evacuation of the patient to the United States. The
majority of such deformities
yielded to massage and exercise. Intractable deformities were
occasionally encountered; they
occurred most, commonly in short amputations of the lower leg, and
thigh. The application of
provisional prosthetic appliances, when this was possible. with the
active
FIG.
141.- This and
Figure 142 show
the provisional appliance used in the Amencan Expeditionary Forces for
above-the-knee amputation. Lateral view with the peg flexed. The frame
can be adjusted to the length of the stump
voluntary movement which their use stimulated, proved the most
valuable single measure in counteracting these contractures.
Unfortunately there were some very bad deformities in which
prosthetic appliances could not be used, either on account of the
presence in the stump of open
wounds or because the amputatioin was associated with an injury to
another part of the body
which necessitated recumbent treatment. In such cases the best
treatment was either continuous
extension or corrective splinting.
702
STUMPS UNSUITABLE FOR PROSTHESIS
Many
healed amputation stumps were unsuitable for prosthesis, either by
reason of
amputation at an unfavorable level or because of insufficient covering
of soft parts. Such cases
usually required formal reamputation. It was against the general policy
to perform these
operations in the American Expeditionary Forces as they needlessly
delayed evacuation to the
United States. Occasionally, when considerable delay in evacuation
obtained, and
FIG. 142.- Front
view. The peg is
extended and locked
when there was assurance of being able to perform the reamputation
cleanly, these operations
were done, but in general they were deferred until after arrival in the
hospitals at home.
PROVISIONAL PROSTHESIS
The
pioneer work of Martin 8 and of Hendricks, both of the
Belgian Medical Corps, in the
early years of the war had demonstrated in striking
703
manner the beneficial effects of early weight bearing in the
treatment of amputations of the lower
limb. It was considered highly desirable to utilize this principle to
as large an extent as possible
in treating the amputation cases of the American Expeditionary Forces.
Prosthetic appliances of
suitable design for amputations of the lower leg and thigh and of
sufficient simplicity to lend
themselves to the purpose were therefore worked out and arrangements
for their manufacture made with the American Red Cross in France.9
The
appliance for thigh amputation consisted of a light steel frame to hold
the socket
which in the region of the knee was joined to a wooden block. This
supported a strong wooden
peg with rubber tip by which the weight was transmitted to the ground.
There was a joint
mechanism at the knee with lock, by means of which the peg could be
flexed when sitting and
locked in extension when standing. The appliance for amputation of the
lower leg consisted of a
light steel frame which terminated below in a simple type of
articulated wooden foot. It was
equipped with a laced leather corset for the thigh which was joined to
the leg portion by steel side
pieces, jointed at the knee. The sockets, in every instance, were of
plaster of Paris, modeled
directly to the patient's stump. The prosthetic appliance was fixed to
the socket by a few turns of
plaster bandage.
FIG.
143.- Type of
temporary appliance
used for hip-joint amputations
The same bearing points were utilized as in the case of the
permanent artificial limbs. These were
chiefly the bony prominences, the tuberosity of the ischium for thigh
amputations and
704
the shelving under surface of the upper end of the tibia for
amputations of the lower leg.
Secondarily the weight was taken by the soft parts, but always in a
manner to relieve the wound
of pressure, the lower end of the socket being left open for this
purpose.
With
temporary legs of this type it was possible to get patients out of bed
and walking
without other support very shortly after amputation. In
FIG.
144.- Patients
with above-the-knee
amputation fitted with the temporary peg leg with plaster socket
the case of clean sutured stumps weight bearing could be begun in
two to three weeks. With open
stumps it was necessary to wait considerably longer, until healing had
progressed to a point
where only a small wound remained. In such cases it was necessary to
take steps to prevent the
soft parts from being pushed upward by the pressure of the socket, a
condition which might cause
separation of the flaps in a recently healed stump, or retraction of
the soft parts and protrusion of
the bone in a stump with an open wound. Protection
705
FIG.
145.- Mechanical
drawing of the
provisional aplliance for below-the-knee amputation used in the
American
Expeditionary Forces
706
FIG.
146.- Application
of the
provisional appliance for below-the-leg amputation. The skeleton leg is
fitted to the
stump and the side irons are bent to conform to its shape
707
was always provided in such cases by the application of
traction. Broad adhesive strips
with tapes were applied to the skin surface above the wound and the
tapes passed down through
the open end of the socket and fastened under tension to the lower
portion of the apparatus.
These traction strips served also to fix the leg to the stump and were
used sometimes in lieu of
suspenders.
While
it was realized from the beginning that the percentage of amputation
cases in the
American Expeditionary Forces to whom this method of treatment could be
adapted would be
small, it was felt that the advantages
FIG.
147.- Application
of the
provisional appliance for below-the-leg amputation. The stump is
covered with
stockinette and the end protected with a cardboard cuff
to be obtained from it when it could be used would be so definite as
to more than justify the
effort. The results achieved more than sustained this prediction. Legs
were applied in about 500
cases or in approximately 20 percent of all amputations of the lower
extremity.10 Early weight
bearing was shown to be of benefit in several different ways. It
promoted wound healing by
improving the circulation, and in cases with terminal localized
osteomyelitis it favored the
separation and spontaneous discharge of sequestra. It hastened stump
shrinkage and prevented
muscle atrophy and the development of joint contractures. In this
respect it was far more valuable
than any form of
708
FIG.
148.- Application
of the
provisional appliance for below-the-leg amputation Two plaster bandages
applied and
modeled carefully to the contour of the stump to form the socket
709
FIG.
149.- Application
of the
provisional appliance for below-the-leg amputation. The provisional
appliance is then applied, the joint centered carefully in relation to
the knee, and the frame incorporated In the plaster socket by
additional turns of plaster bandage
710
physiotherapy. It had an important psychological effect in
counteracting despondency and in
improving the patient's morale. In the healed cases it
FIG.
150.- Application
of the
provisional appliance for below-the-leg amputation. The upper margin of
the socket is
carefully lined with pencil, passing front just below the patella and
being hollowed out behind to allow flexion of the
knee
greatly reduced the intervening time until the permanent artificial
limb could be fitted, and thus
shortened the period of convalescence.
711
FIG.
151.- The
temporary leg completed,
ready to apply
FIG.
152.- Group of
soldiers fitted
with temporary peg legs. These were the appliances used before the
development
of the articulated foot appliance
712
REFERENCES
(1) Circular No. 46, Office of the
Chief Surgeon, A. E. F., August 16, 1918.
(2) History of the Hospital Center,
Savenay. On file, Historical Division, S. G. O., Part Two, 98-146.
(3) History of Base Hospital No. 9.
On file, Historical Division, S. G. O.
(4) History of Hospital Center, Beau
Desert. On file, Historical Division, S. G. O. History of Hospital
Center,
Kerhuon. On file, Historical Division, S. G. O.
(5) Conclusions sur les amputations
adoptées par la conférence chirurgicale interalliée, 2d session, 14th
to 19th
May, 1917. Archives de médecine et de pharmacie militaires,
Paris, 1917, lxviii, 272.
(6) U. S. War Department. Surgeon
General's Office. Medical and Surgical History of the War of the
Rebellion.
Surgical Volume, Part III, 809. Government Printing Office, Washington,
1883.
(7) Bunge.: Zur Technik der Erzielung
tragfähiger Diaphysensttüpfe ohne Osteoplastik. Beiträdge zur
klinischen Chirurgie, Tülibingen, 1905, xlvii, No. 3, 808.
(8) Martin: In "Interallied
Conference on the Care of Disabled Sailors and Soldiers. Lancet,
London, June 22, 1918,
i, 881.
(9) The Military History of the
American Red Cross in France, by Lieut. Col. C. C. Burlingame, M. C.
Copy on
file, Historical Division, S. G. O.
(10) Annual Report of the Surgeon
General, U. S. Army, 1919, ii, 1106.
|